Dom Juan, by Molière

If I’m going to read more Restoration Comedy, then I’m going to need to read some Molière to go along with it, because it certainly seems that they did. (After all, as far as I recall, the French court is where they were all hanging out before the Restoration). We don’t tend to read Molière in this country (I’ve certainly never encountered anyone who has; though I’ve a vague recollection of Tartuffe from somewhere in the past), for much the same reason no doubt that we don’t read any Racine or Corneille – though what this reason actually is, I’m not sure.

Dom Juan is an early (1665) “Death of God” work – i.e. if, now we are enlightened rationalists, we accept that God does not exist, what does this mean for morality and society. The Dom himself is a young man who has decided to act as he likes (he has, let us say, a “will to power”), and ignore the dictates of society around him. The play starts with him leaving the woman he has just married because he only married her in order to sleep with her, has now tired of her, and is off pursuing another woman. It turns out this marriage and desertion has long been his modus operandi. He is a serial bigamist. (One of Stendhal’s Italian Chronicles is also about our Don Juan – he mentions Molière’s version, I recall – but is even more extreme in its breaking of accepted moral codes (incest, paedophilia etc.)).

He is an atheist too, a blasphemer. Here he is in a scene where he encounters a beggar.

Dom Juan: How do you pass your time here among all these trees?
Man: I pray all day long for the prosperity of the kind people who give me alms?
Dom Juan: You are quite comfortably off then, I suppose?
Man: Alas, sir, no! I am in the greatest penury.
Dom Juan: What, a man who prays all day long can’t fail to be well off.
Man: I assure you, sir, I often haven’t even a crust to put in my mouth.
Dom Juan: That’s strange. You’re not very well rewarded for your trouble. See here. I’ll give you a gold louis, if you’ll utter a blasphemy.
Man: Oh, sir, would you have me commit such a terrible sin?
Dom Juan: The question is, do you want this piece of gold, or not? I’ll give it to you if you blaspheme. Come now.

Of course, atheism and self-gratification weren’t so well-respected back then, so I guess our hero learns the error of his ways?

Well, yes he does: he learns that going around seeking carelessly after his own pleasure with no concern for morality is likely to lead to trouble; and what he ought to do to avoid this, is disguise his hedonism behind a veil hypocrisy – like everyone else.

The play was quickly banned by the authorities.

There are some good parts to Dom Juan, but it’s very much a patchwork of a play – a collection of comic scenes awkwardly strung together into a plot, with the occasionally philosophical dialogue tying them together. I actually enjoyed more the play I read just before, The Reluctant Doctor, (the plays share a common contempt for the practice of medicine), which is shorter and more tightly-bound, with a penchant for Punch-and-Judy style violence.

More Molière to come: I’ve tracked down most of it in English. – He’s funnier than Shakespeare, if that’s any sort of recommendation. In fact, I find myself relating a lot more to the humour in Restoration Comedy than that of their Jacobean forbears. These plays might have been written 350 years ago, but with a few adjustments for cultural context, Molière would work perfectly well as a sitcom (a Blackadder sort of thing; certainly funnier than most of what I shall have to put up with over the festive season). I’m not sure really that much has changed in our sense of humour.

4 thoughts on “Dom Juan, by Molière

  1. And Molière & other French playwrights were reading Spanish plays. Where does it end?

    Molière is generally funnier than Shakespeare, I agree with that.

  2. Aeschylus?

    All playwrights copy from other playwrights – just not all to the extent of Richard Brinsley Sheridan.

  3. I studied this one in school, it’s not my favourite Molière. Religious themes tend to put me off, except when it’s Tartuffe.
    Le Misanthrope is excellent and I discovered The School for Wives last year and enjoyed it a lot.

    Anyway,I love Molière and I prefer Shakespeare to Racine and Corneille. These two are no fun.

    PS: I’m very bad at keeping track of posts if I don’t get an e-mail when something new is published. Would you mind adding a “subscribe via email” button to your blog?

    PPS: I see you’re reading La vie devant soi. I’m curious to read your thoughts about it.


  4. It’s funny but for some reason Le Misanthrope is the one play by Moliere I’m having difficulty tracking down – which is of course a bit odd. I shall as usual read all the more obscure ones first.

    My first thought about Le vie devant soi is why no one made the connection between Ajar and Gary. I know I don’t read much contemporary / recent French literature, but they seem to exist in similar worlds – I.e. immigrant communities. Or maybe it’s just the novels I’ve happened to read so far.

    I will look at the e-mail subscription thing next week. I think there is anadd-on I can apply.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s